When a faculty member discovers an act of academic dishonesty (as defined in The Student Code of Conduct), they should follow the directions given below. Faculty members may not impose sanctions without going through this University approved process, as we need to ensure each student receives due process. Additionally, by filing all reports of academic dishonesty with the Office of Community Standards & Student Conduct, we can ensure additional follow-up for repeat offenders. Please note that this process applies to both undergraduate and graduate students, as well as all students enrolled in online courses. This process supersedes all other policies and procedures within departments and programs.
Complete the Form. When a faculty member discovers an act of academic dishonesty, they should use the Academic Integrity Form included (available for download on the right side of this page) to document the alleged violation. To complete the form, please follow the steps below.
“Article III. 1. (b). Student used cell phone during exam.”
“Article III. 1. (a) Student plagiarized material on paper.”
“Article III. 1. (l) Student assisted another student in cheating.
Write a Statement. You should submit a statement detailing each charge with the Academic Integrity Form. This statement should include the following information:
Time you became aware of the incident
How you concluded that academic dishonesty had occurred
Names and contact information of possible witnesses
Description of any evidence or documentation that you submit with the form
Rationale for choosing the sanction
Is this class online or in a classroom setting?
Did the student respond to the email requesting an Academic Integrity Conference within the allotted number of days? If not, attach a copy of email that was sent.
Did the student show up for the Academic Integrity Conference?
Choose a Sanction. The purpose of a sanction is twofold. First, it deters the student from committing future violations. Second, it can help educate the student about academic integrity. The choice of sanction should be based solely on the current allegations against the student, and should not consider any previous violations or unaddressed allegations with the same instructor or another instructor.
Warning: A warning is appropriate in situations where some of the following criteria are met. A warning is never appropriate when the incident involves a final exam, a senior's project, or a graduate thesis or dissertation.
The act was done in the “heat of the moment.”
The act was not premeditated.
The student is repentant.
The act involves a smaller assignment.
The instance can serve as a learning opportunity.
There is no reason to believe the student will engage in academic dishonesty again.
Grade Penalty: You have two options for a grade penalty. You can choose to lower the grade on an assignment related to the incident or you can choose an overall grade penalty for the course. A grade penalty is appropriate when the faculty member believes that one or more of these criteria are met:
The act was premeditated.
The act was related to a larger assignment, such as an exam.
The act was related to a final exam.
The student is unrepentant.
To determine the appropriate grade penalty the faculty member should consider:
The importance of the exam or assignment involved. Cheating on an assignment that counts more towards a final grade could be considered worse that cheating on a smaller assignment.
How much could the student potentially have benefited if not caught?
What was the level of intent? A student may simply have shown negligence or recklessness.
What was the level of knowledge? If a student let another student borrow an assignment, is it reasonable to assume that the student would have known that the assignment would have been copied?
What was the level of premeditation?
Did the student directly violate a policy set out in the syllabus?
Requesting additional action from the Student Academic Grievance Subcommittee: If you believe that the student should face suspension or expulsion, you must choose this option. This is the appropriate option when:
The incident has damaged the reputation of the University.
When the incident involves several members of the university community.
When the incident involves a senior project, Master's thesis, or dissertation.
Other: You may also impose other sanctions. This would be appropriate if the student is repentant and you see an opportunity to educate the student about the incident in a way that will be impactful for that individual. Additionally, if the alleged academic dishonesty occurred outside of the course, this may also be an appropriate sanction. In choosing another sanction option, please be sure to select a due date for this sanction, and include that date on the Academic Integrity Form. You should not choose this option to humiliate or denigrate the student.
Potential examples of other sanctions include:
Require that the student write an essay about the importance of academic integrity.
Require the student to redo the assignment, exam, or quiz.
Require that the student complete extra work for the course.
Once you have completed the first part of the Academic Integrity Form and collected all supporting documentation, you need to invite the student to a meeting to discuss the allegations (called an Academic Integrity Conference). The student must be notified of the allegations within two (2) working days of the discovery of the incident, and the Academic Integrity Conference must occur within seven (7) working days of the notification mentioned above. Ideally the meeting should occur in person, however, the meeting can be conducted via email, video conference, or over the phone.
At the meeting you should present the student with the allegations, including presenting evidence of the allegations. Listen to the student's perspective on the incident to determine if the allegations hold.
At any time if the student returns to you to discuss the incident, you may choose to alter the charges or sanctions of your own volition. If the student approaches you after having initially refused to sign the form, but they now admit to the charges, please submit a new (signed) Academic Integrity Form to the Office of Community Standards & Student Conduct. This new form will negate the first (unsigned) form.
As explained above, your Chairperson and Dean will be aware of the case and will have an opportunity to review documents related to the case. They have the option to submit a statement in support of you or the student and.or participate in the Student Academic Grievance Subcommittee hearing. Therefore, please consider having a personal conversation with your Chairperson and/or Dean about the case.
The Academic Integrity Form will be forwarded to you with the appropriate documentation. You are encouraged to review the documents and possibly initiate a conversation with the faculty member involved. You have the option of submitting a statement with your signature and/or participating in the Student Academic Grievance Subcommittee hearing. This statement could explain your support for the faculty member or student. You also have the option to submit supporting documentation you deem relevant.
Portal